← Team profiles

Zimbabwe

Five years of results, read from this team's own point of view.

Rating

57

Above average — top 32% · Glicko-2 1293 ±95

Record

11-0-6

64.7% of 17 matches in the last five years

Average margin

+6.2

27.5 for, 21.2 against

Home advantage

+2.3

Points per match better at home

Attack

+5%

27.5 scored per match, against the placed field's average

Defence

+23%

21.2 conceded per match; positive is fewer than average

The Sables
Head coach
Pieter Benade
Captain
Hilton Mudariki
Union
Zimbabwe Rugby Union
Emblem
Sable antelope
Home ground
Harare Sports Club
First match
Southern Rhodesia 11–24 British Isles (Bulawayo, Rhodesia; 30 July 1910)}}
World Cups
3, from 1987
Best World Cup
Pool stage (1987, 1991)

Anthem

Kalibusiswe Ilizwe leZimbabwe

Ndebele · April 18, 1994 · 1:37

The words are still in copyright, so they are not reproduced here.

Recording from nationalanthems.info, used under CC BY 4.0.

From Wikipedia, read 2026-10-19. Not an input to any forecast — the rating does not know who is coaching.

Recent results
  • Canada2026-07-18 · away19–23lost
  • USA2026-07-11 · away15–31lost
  • Tonga2026-07-0426–36lost
  • Namibia2025-07-1930–28won
  • Kenya2025-07-1329–23won

Newest first, from Zimbabwe's own point of view. Home and away are as the record stores them; a fixture the record does not mark neutral is listed as one side's home, which is right for a league round and wrong for a final played at a third ground.

Shape
Matches decided by seven or fewer35%
Matches totalling 50 or more41%
Margin swing19.2 points
Last five, most recent firstlostlostlostwonwonL3

Biggest win: 62-22 v United Arab Emirates

Heaviest defeat: 10-41 v Namibia

Where they stand (of 65 ranked teams)
Rating57
1Q1 32Med 49Q3 6492

Above average — top 32%

Box is the middle half of the ranked field, line is the median, dot is Zimbabwe. The scale is this domain's own and does not compare across the two.

Most similar teams
Teams with too few matches to rate confidently, which are most of the outliers.

Teams that play alike sit close together. The two axes hold 72% of the variation between teams. Component 1 (42%) rises with more average margin and win rate. Component 2 (30%) rises with more high-scoring matches and margin swing.

31 of 66 teams sit too close together to name without covering another team's point, so they are drawn unlabelled. Every dot is still a link to that team, and hovering one names it.

  1. 1England0.17
  2. 2Moldova0.41
  3. 3Denmark0.80
  4. 4Finland0.92
  5. 5Algeria0.95

Distance in the projection above, nearest first.

Rugby Tournament Predictor — unofficial, and not affiliated with any union, club or competition. About and sourcesForecasts are probabilities, not predictions of one result.

Search

Jump to a tournament, a page, or a team